Faecal Glucocorticoid Concentrations during ACTH Challenge Tests in Captive Grizzly Bears (Ursus arctos horribilus) and Polar Bears (Ursus maritimus)
The well-being of wild and captive animals is often assessed through the measurement of faecal glucocorticoid metabolite (FGM) concentrations. In order to determine the temporal relationships between faecal glucocorticoids and events that might elicit increases in glucocorticoid secretion, we conducted adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) challenge tests on polar (Ursus maritimus) and grizzly bears (Ursus arctos horribilis) at the Louisville Zoo. FGMs were measured for three days before and after an injection of ACTH, using DA Corticosterone I-125 kits (ICN MP Biomedicals). FGM excretion increased 343–2258% over baseline concentrations. The latency to maximum excretion ranged from 4.5 h to 28.5 h. Five of the bears produced their maximum FGM excretion within 6.2 h of the ACTH injection. The first day’s mean FGM concentration after ACTH injection for the six bears (mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM): 106.4±21.3 ng/g dry wt) was significantly higher than the mean baseline concentration (mean ± SEM: 22.3±5.3 ng/g dry wt). The results are consistent with the values obtained in other studies of captive mammals, including polar bears and grizzly bears. However, compared to previous publications, our results suggest that a shorter latency to peak response can occur in bears and that collection of faeces to evaluate peak responses should occur within hours rather than days of stimulation of the adrenal cortex with ACTH.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).