Bear weight management: a diet reduction plan for an obese spectacled bear (Tremarctos ornatus)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19227/jzar.v1i2.37

Abstract

Spectacled bears (Tremarctos ornatus) are agile climbers and many aspects of behaviour in the wild are related to procuring food.  In captive situations obesity can result from reduced activity and offering food in excess of energy requirements if food is not presented in a way that encourages increased foraging time.  In December 2006, a fifteen-year-old male spectacled bear was received into quarantine at the Smithsonian Institution’s National Zoological Park. During the quarantine examination, nutrition staff manually assessed body condition and at 222.5 kg, the animal was deemed grossly obese with a body condition score of 9 on a 1–9 point scale.  A weight reduction plan was developed with a goal of gradual and continual weight loss at a rate of 1.0% of initial body weight (BW) per week, with a maximum of 2.0% and a minimum of 0.5% of initial BW/week to reach an initial summer target BW of 170 kg in 6–8 months.  Once the initial goal was achieved, seasonal target BW ranges were further refined over the following 12 months, resulting in a total weight loss of 77 kg (35% of initial BW).  Throughout the process keepers noted a marked positive increase in physical activity and associated behaviours.  The male was successfully introduced to a newly acquired female spectacled bear and mating occurred during June 2009, with two genetically valuable cubs born in January 2010.

Author Biographies

  • Karen J. Lisi, Smithsonian Institution
    National Zoological Park
  • Tracey L. Barnes, Smithsonian Institution
    National Zoological Park
  • Mark S. Edwards, California Polytechnic State University
    Animal Science Department

Downloads

Published

31-10-2013

Issue

Section

Evidence Based Practice

How to Cite

Bear weight management: a diet reduction plan for an obese spectacled bear (Tremarctos ornatus). (2013). Journal of Zoo and Aquarium Research, 1(2), 81-84. https://doi.org/10.19227/jzar.v1i2.37