Annual fecal glucocorticoid metabolite concentrations in pregnant and pseudopregnant polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in North American zoos
Polar bears face a tenuous existence in the wild due to climate change and in North American zoos due to a shrinking population and low reproductive success. A non-invasive diagnostic test that distinguishes pregnant from pseudopregnant bears is necessary to pinpoint when reproductive failure is occurring. However, fecal hormone metabolite patterns commonly used to determine pregnancy in other species are not diagnostic in this species. The goals of this study were to determine: 1) if fecal glucocorticoid metabolite (FGM) concentrations could be used to differentiate pregnant from pseudopregnant bears, 2) baseline “normal” FGM concentrations excreted throughout the year, and 3) seasonal impacts on FGM concentrations. Fecal samples collected from pregnant (n = 3) and pseudopregnant (n = 3) polar bears for approximately 12 consecutive months were analyzed using an established cortisol EIA. Although mean FGM concentrations appeared slightly higher in pseudopregnant bears during the winter, spring, and summer seasons, statistical analyses using a Friedman’s test indicated there were no differences overall (p = 0.10). Furthermore, there were no consistent changes in profile patterns exhibited by all individuals in each group. Additionally, there were no differences in FGM concentrations among seasons (p = 0.896). Baseline FGM concentrations for pregnant and pseudopregnant bears ranged from 11.0 - 28.5 ng/g and from 36.8 - 42.2 ng/g, respectively. However, the individual profiles were dynamic, with spikes in FGM ranging from 161.4 to 416.8 ng/g. Study results indicate that FGM concentrations will not facilitate pregnancy diagnosis in polar bears.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).